<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tech Law Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog</link>
	<description>Law Blog for Technologists, powered by www.faithatlaw.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:10:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Green IT: How Virtualization can Save Earth and Your Butt by Greening IT and Recovering from Systems Failures &#8211; A &#8220;twofer&#8221; at Tech Two Consulting of Maryland</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/green-it-how-virtualization-can-save-earth-and-your-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Greening IT and Recovering from Systems Failures &#8211; A &#8220;twofer&#8221; at Tech Two Consulting of Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=74#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] read the remainder of this posting, check it out on Tech Law Notes, courtesy Tim Faith and Faith at Law, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the remainder of this posting, check it out on Tech Law Notes, courtesy Tim Faith and Faith at Law, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meaningful Use Gets A Definition by Meaningful Use Gets a Definition at Health IT 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-gets-a-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaningful Use Gets a Definition at Health IT 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=344#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meaningful Use &#8211; Some Thoughts by Thoughts on Meaningful Use at Health IT 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Meaningful Use at Health IT 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=348#comment-343</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meaningful Use Gets A Definition by tfaith</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-gets-a-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>tfaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=344#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this article for a helpful table of the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines and measures for eligible professionals: http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-news/the-stimulus-bill-and-meaningful-use-of-qualified-emrs-1031209/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this article for a helpful table of the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines and measures for eligible professionals: <a href="http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-news/the-stimulus-bill-and-meaningful-use-of-qualified-emrs-1031209/" rel="nofollow">http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-news/the-stimulus-bill-and-meaningful-use-of-qualified-emrs-1031209/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Neutrality: An Analysis by Net Neutrality: An Analysis : Tech Law Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/12/net-neutrality-an-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Neutrality: An Analysis : Tech Law Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=331#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Security by iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes &#124; Coder Online</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/12/iphone-security/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes &#124; Coder Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=325#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] Visit link: iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visit link: iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Licensing for Businesses by Software Licensing for Businesses : Tech Law Notes Software Rss</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/12/software-licensing-for-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Licensing for Businesses : Tech Law Notes Software Rss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=320#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Neutrality &amp; Other Misnomers by Stuart Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/12/net-neutrality-other-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=317#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Tim--I disagree. In essence, Verizon (through FiOS) and Comcast have a duopoly.  They also sell content. In the case of FiOS, it is merely as an agent (i.e., you buy cable through Verizon) and in the case of Comcast both as an agent and, now, as a direct provider (via Comcast&#039;s purchase of NBC). Neither have any incentive to provide the Internet service that we need, since such service would destroy their business models which are based on the strangle-hold that they maintain in the market.

Assume that everyone has available, at a modest price, very, very, very fast downloads and very, very, very fast uploads.  What would happen?

The same thing that&#039;s happening to newspapers.  There would be a great deal of content available and the price we pay for content would fall.  Moreover, we&#039;d get really good VOIP phone services with all sorts of enhancements and at a lower price.

We need (i) network neutrality and (ii) a government edict to force Verizon and Comcast to offer, for a low price, very, very, very fast internet service, but up and down, with a high quality of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8211;I disagree. In essence, Verizon (through FiOS) and Comcast have a duopoly.  They also sell content. In the case of FiOS, it is merely as an agent (i.e., you buy cable through Verizon) and in the case of Comcast both as an agent and, now, as a direct provider (via Comcast&#8217;s purchase of NBC). Neither have any incentive to provide the Internet service that we need, since such service would destroy their business models which are based on the strangle-hold that they maintain in the market.</p>
<p>Assume that everyone has available, at a modest price, very, very, very fast downloads and very, very, very fast uploads.  What would happen?</p>
<p>The same thing that&#8217;s happening to newspapers.  There would be a great deal of content available and the price we pay for content would fall.  Moreover, we&#8217;d get really good VOIP phone services with all sorts of enhancements and at a lower price.</p>
<p>We need (i) network neutrality and (ii) a government edict to force Verizon and Comcast to offer, for a low price, very, very, very fast internet service, but up and down, with a high quality of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From My Pen to Your e-Record by From My Pen to Your e-Record : Tech Law Notes &#124; Pen Portal</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/11/from-my-pen-to-your-e-record/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>From My Pen to Your e-Record : Tech Law Notes &#124; Pen Portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=301#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] more from the original source: From My Pen to Your e-Record : Tech Law Notes    Tags: 28-tags, clever-use, electronic-health, get-some, minutes, shareable, tiny-camera, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more from the original source: From My Pen to Your e-Record : Tech Law Notes    Tags: 28-tags, clever-use, electronic-health, get-some, minutes, shareable, tiny-camera, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health IT Implementation &#8211; an Overview by Implementing Health IT at Health IT 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/health-it-implementation-an-overview/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Implementing Health IT at Health IT 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=102#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
