<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EHR &amp; HiTech &#8211; More Money for More Health Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/</link>
	<description>Law Blog for Technologists, powered by www.faithatlaw.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:10:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2009: The Year of Health IT? at Health IT 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>2009: The Year of Health IT? at Health IT 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-331</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Quest for Meaningful Use : Tech Law Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>The Quest for Meaningful Use : Tech Law Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-329</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Eriksen</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eriksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-16</guid>
		<description>There has actually yet to be a decision on which certifying body the government will use.  Most people will agree that CCHIT is it, but the verdict is still out.  Using CCHIT will cut out a lot of good programs who do not have the capital to invest in the certification process which costs hundreds of thousands of dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has actually yet to be a decision on which certifying body the government will use.  Most people will agree that CCHIT is it, but the verdict is still out.  Using CCHIT will cut out a lot of good programs who do not have the capital to invest in the certification process which costs hundreds of thousands of dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Health IT : Tech Law Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Health IT : Tech Law Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tfaith</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>tfaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-11</guid>
		<description>A reader of the blog also pointed out that CCHIT certification is required in order for the health care provider to be reimbursed under the Medicare program.  CCHIT lists certified vendors on its web site, www.cchit.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader of the blog also pointed out that CCHIT certification is required in order for the health care provider to be reimbursed under the Medicare program.  CCHIT lists certified vendors on its web site, <a href="http://www.cchit.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cchit.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health IT Implementation &#8211; an Overview : Tech Law Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Health IT Implementation &#8211; an Overview : Tech Law Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Computing and Other Buzz Words : Tech Law Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Computing and Other Buzz Words : Tech Law Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
